The emotional resonance of President Trump’s rhetoric exists because his speeches about fear, insecurity and resentment mirror the fears, insecurities and resentments of his supporters. The psychological explanation for this attachment is identity fusion. Every speech creates and reinforces a powerful feedback loop between Trump and base.
Donald Trump’s supporters often say he “tells it like it is,” meaning they perceive him as an authentic, straightforward speaker who expresses what they want to say but dare not say in public. Perplexity AI summarizes the complexity and nuance of these attitudes as follows:
- Authenticity Despite Falsehoods: Studies show that many Trump supporters view him as authentic even when he makes false or exaggerated statements. They interpret his bold, brash style as a form of symbolic protest against the political establishment, valuing his challenge to elites over factual accuracy. This perceived authenticity fuels their enthusiasm and loyalty3.
- Relishing Brashness and Defiance: Supporters often embrace Trump’s exaggerations and outright lies because they see his “say-whatever” style as a sign of strength and defiance. They appreciate his audacity to say things others won’t, especially when he mocks or attacks perceived enemies like the media, Democrats, or the establishment. For them, his willingness to flout norms is part of his appeal1.
- Emotional and Cultural Resonance: Trump’s rhetoric taps into voter insecurities, grievances, and resentments. His direct, unfiltered communication style resonates with those who feel ignored or marginalized by traditional politicians. His rhetoric’s simplicity, repetition, and confrontational tone foster a sense of loyalty and identification among supporters4.
- Performance of Authenticity: Some analysts argue that Trump’s “telling it like it is” is a carefully crafted persona rather than literal blunt truth-telling. His overconfidence and theatrical style create an impression of forthrightness, even when his claims are misleading or false. This performance satisfies voters who want a leader who appears to share their feelings and frustrations, regardless of factual accuracy.
When Trump’s supporters say he “tells it like it is,” what they mean is that he is factually reporting their fears, anxieties and frustrations.
- Trump supporters often feel that American values, traditions, and economic prosperity are under threat, leading to strong alignment with Trump’s messaging.
- The sense of losing status—whether defined by race, religion, gender, or class—is a powerful motivator. Many Trump voters perceive existential threats from changing social dynamics, such as increased diversity and shifting power structures that minimize their control in politics and culture.
There are several psychological drivers that explain radical support for Trump by some people:
- Psychological mechanisms such as identity fusion, confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, and echo chambers make supporters more likely to trust information that validates their fears and beliefs while dismissing the rest.
- Fear and anxiety—including fears of terrorism, crime, and foreign influence—are more pronounced among Trump supporters than in the general population, and Trump’s promises of protection and toughness provide reassurance.
- Trump’s charismatic and assertive public persona, as well as his use of conspiracy theories, reinforce a narrative of threats, victimhood and the need for a “strongman” to protect them and deliver them from all their problems.
What supporters admire and value in Trump is his boldness, defiance, and perceived authenticity to express their fears and take radical measures to allay those fears. He is a symbol of resistance and empowerment for followers who feel marginalized by the political, economic and social status quo. Here are a few facts about how Trump’s supporters see him:
- They see his rhetoric and his policies as a form of protest and empowerment against the political establishment and intellectual elites whom they fear.
- They perceive him as giving voice to frustrations that, in their view, have been dismissed or silenced by those in power or by mainstream media and academia.
- They welcome and embrace his exaggerations and behaviors because he is doing what they want to do but are unable to do for lack of money, courage and authority — all of which Trump has.
- He gives voice to their latent anger, shame and fear.
- He offers simple solutions (e.g. conspiracy theories, closed borders, tariffs, wars, etc.) and scapegoats (e.g. immigrants, Democrats, people of color, etc.) that appeal to his followers needs to explain complex issues that (e.g. social, environmental, health, economic, etc.) ande solve existential problems that no one else seems able to solve.
- He is their champion in the existential battle against people who have, or seem to be acquiring, more power and influence than they do (e.g., Democrats, liberal media, people of color, people with education and money, people who are not Christian, etc.)
Trump knows that these are the ways that his followers see him. His communication style, therefore, is less about facts and politics, and more about emotional resonance with his supporters. and opposition to people who have, or seem to be acquiring, more power and influence than they do (e.g., Democrats, liberal media, people of color, people with education and money, etc.)
These are the facts about Trump and his followers that liberal progressives need to understand. But these concepts are foreign to liberals and progressives for whom politics, character, rule of law, and good government are their only real priorities. Nevertheless, if democrats and progressives don’t make a serious effort to understand how Trump and his followers think and feel about Trump and themselves, they will never be able to communicate effectively with Trump or his followers at the social level or in government or understand why he does what he does.
Politics, diplomacy and good government are easy problems to solve compared to the psychology of fear, shame, identity fusion, confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, and echo chambers.
RESOURCES FOR FURTHER STUDY